> CVE-2026-2673

« BACK_TO_HOME
PUBLISHED
2026-03-13 19:54
MODIFIED
2026-03-13 19:54
EPSS (Prob. Exploit)
0.51%
Top 57.4%
DATA SOURCES:
NVD 🔗 2026-03-13 RED HAT 🔗 2026-03-15 CWE MITRE 🔗 2026-11-01 FIRST EPSS 🔗 2026-10-25 OSV 🔗 2026-03-20 MSRC 🔗 2026-11-02

> DESCRIPTION

Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes the default by using the 'DEFAULT' keyword. Impact summary: A less preferred key exchange may be used even when a more preferred group is supported by both client and server, if the group was not included among the client's initial predicated keyshares. This will sometimes be the case with the new hybrid post-quantum groups, if the client chooses to defer their use until specifically requested by the server. If an OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server's configuration uses the 'DEFAULT' keyword to interpolate the built-in default group list into its own configuration, perhaps adding or removing specific elements, then an implementation defect causes the 'DEFAULT' list to lose its 'tuple' structure, and all server-supported groups were treated as a single sufficiently secure 'tuple', with the server not sending a Hello Retry Request (HRR) even when a group in a more preferred tuple was mutually supported. As a result, the client and server might fail to negotiate a mutually supported post-quantum key agreement group, such as 'X25519MLKEM768', if the client's configuration results in only 'classical' groups (such as 'X25519' being the only ones in the client's initial keyshare prediction). OpenSSL 3.5 and later support a new syntax for selecting the most preferred TLS 1.3 key agreement group on TLS servers. The old syntax had a single 'flat' list of groups, and treated all the supported groups as sufficiently secure. If any of the keyshares predicted by the client were supported by the server the most preferred among these was selected, even if other groups supported by the client, but not included in the list of predicted keyshares would have been more preferred, if included. The new syntax partitions the groups into distinct 'tuples' of roughly equivalent security. Within each tuple the most preferred group included among the client's predicted keyshares is chosen, but if the client supports a group from a more preferred tuple, but did not predict any corresponding keyshares, the server will ask the client to retry the ClientHello (by issuing a Hello Retry Request or HRR) with the most preferred mutually supported group. The above works as expected when the server's configuration uses the built-in default group list, or explicitly defines its own list by directly defining the various desired groups and group 'tuples'. No OpenSSL FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the code in question lies outside the FIPS boundary. OpenSSL 3.6 and 3.5 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.2 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.6 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 are not affected by this issue.

> AFFECTED_PRODUCTS

ℹ️ Aucun produit affecté n'a encore été publié par NVD pour cette CVE.

> WEAKNESSES

CWE-757

> CWE DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS

CWE-757: Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation - A protocol or its implementation supports interaction between multiple actors and allows those actors to negotiate which algorithm should be used in a protection mechanism such as encryption or authentication, but it does not select the strongest algorithm that is available to both parties.

> RED HAT SECURITY ADVISORIES

Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Core Services Apache HTTP Server 2.4.62 SP4 security update
Red Hat JBoss Core Services Apache HTTP Server 2.4.62 Service Pack 4 is now available. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Moderate. A Common Vulnerability S...
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Web Server 7.0.0 security release
Red Hat JBoss Web Server 7.0.0 zip release is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9, Red Hat Linux Enterprise 10, and Windows Server. Red Hat Product Security has r...
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Web Server 6.2.4 release and security update
Red Hat JBoss Web Server 6.2.4 zip release is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, and Windows Server. Red Hat Product Security has r...
Red Hat Security Advisory: cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.18.2
cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.18.2
Red Hat Security Advisory: cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.18.2
cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.18.2
Red Hat Security Advisory: cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.18.2
cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.18.2
Red Hat Security Advisory: cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.17.2
cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.17.2
Red Hat Security Advisory: cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.17.2
cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.17.2
Red Hat Security Advisory: cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.17.2
cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.17.2
Red Hat Security Advisory: cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.18.2
cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.18.2

> RED HAT SEVERITY ASSESSMENT

THREAT SEVERITY
Low

> OSV (GOOGLE OPEN SOURCE VULNERABILITIES)

AFFECTED PACKAGES:
Unknown / Unknown
71 versions affected

> HISTORIQUE DES MODIFICATIONS

Première apparition
13/03/2026 19:54
Source: NVD
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 01/11/2026 06:58
CWE
Champ modifié: Description CWE
Ancienne valeur:
CWE-757: Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation ('Algorithm Downgrade') - A protocol or its implementation supports interaction between multiple actors and allows those actors to negoti...
Nouvelle valeur:
CWE-757: Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation - A protocol or its implementation supports interaction between multiple actors and allows those actors to negotiate which algorithm shou...
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 01/04/2026 06:02
CWE
Champ modifié: Description CWE
Ancienne valeur:
N/A
Nouvelle valeur:
CWE-757: Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation ('Algorithm Downgrade') - A protocol or its implementation supports interaction between multiple actors and allows those actors to negoti...
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 15/03/2026 05:01
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 23:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 22:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 21:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 20:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 19:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 18:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 17:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 16:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 15:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 14:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 13:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 12:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 11:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 10:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 09:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 08:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 07:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 06:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 05:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 04:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 03:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 02:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 01:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
{ "severity_scale": null, "threat_severity": "Low" }
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 00:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Sévérité Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
N/A
Nouvelle valeur:
{ "threat_severity": "Low", "severity_scale": null }
📊 ENRICHISSEMENT 14/03/2026 00:30
REDHAT
Champ modifié: Red Hat
Ancienne valeur:
Non
Nouvelle valeur:
Oui
Total des modifications: 28 Dernière mise à jour: 1 week ago

> REFERENCES

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2157c9d81f7b0bd7dfa25b960e928ec28e8dd6...
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/85977e013f32ceb96aa034c0e741adddc1a05e...
https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260313.txt
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/03/13/3
« BACK_TO_HOME