> DAST vs AI Code: Why Dynamic Application Security Testing Can’t Keep Pace

DAST vs AI Code: TL;DR Traditional DAST requires 8+ hours for comprehensive scanning while AI-generated code deploys 10 times daily. This speed mismatch creates a fundamental security gap: most organizations run DAST weekly, leaving 70+ deployments unchecked between scans. The Contrast Runtime Security Platform offers a fundamentally different approach by embedding security directly into application runtime to detect vulnerabilities as they deploy and block attacks as they happen. The post DAST vs AI Code: Why Dynamic Application Security Testing Can’t Keep Pace appeared first on Security Boulevard.